QLP Qing Li Peptides
Vials tend to hold more than the label (median +9.4%); 0 of 5 vials were more than 10% under.
For research use only. VendorVerify sells nothing and takes no money from vendors. No affiliate links, no coupon codes, no paid rankings. How scores work
Every vial we have on file
- Within ±5% / purity 99%+
- 5–20% under, overfilled / purity 95–99%
- Failed: over 20% under, over 50% over, empty or under 95% pure
Dose vs label
5 vials measured · 0 emptyPurity
5 vials measured- Median purity
- 99.18%
- across 5 vials
- Median dose vs label
- +9.4%
- across 5 vials; + means more than the label
- Failed vials
- 0.0%
- 0 of 5 vials; the rate weights each lab report equally and recent reports more, as the score does
- Lab reports
- 5
- Oct 7, 2025 to Oct 7, 2025
Labs: Janoshik
Key facts
- VendorVerify holds third-party lab results for 5 QLP vials from 5 lab reports, dated Oct 2025 to Oct 2025.
- 0 of 5 QLP vials failed: empty, under 95% pure, more than 20% under the label or more than 50% over it.
- The median QLP vial tested at 99.18% purity across 5 vials with a purity result.
- The median QLP vial held +9.4% compared with its label across 5 vials where the lab measured the amount.
- Buyers have had 5 different compounds from QLP lab tested.
- QLP ranks #16 of 30 ranked vendors on the VendorVerify score.
- QLP vials on file were tested by Janoshik.
By peptide
| Peptide | Vials | Failed | Median purity | Median dose vs label | Dose vs label, −20% to +20% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epitalon | 1 | 0 | 99.18% | −4.4% | |
| Ipamorelin | 1 | 0 | 98.59% | +38.8% | |
| MOTS-C | 1 | 0 | 99.79% | +9.4% | |
| PT-141 | 1 | 0 | 99.92% | +17.9% | |
| SS-31 | 1 | 0 | 99.16% | +2.0% |
Lab reports
One row per tested vial, newest first.
| Date | Peptide | Lab | Label | Measured | Dose vs label | Purity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2025 | IpamorelinBatch Aug 20 2025 pink caps | Janoshik | 5 mg | 6.94 mg | +38.8% | 98.59% |
| Oct 7, 2025 | SS-31Batch Sept 4 2025 blue caps | Janoshik | 10 mg | 10.2 mg | +2.0% | 99.16% |
| Oct 7, 2025 | EpitalonBatch Aug 26 2025 orange caps | Janoshik | 10 mg | 9.56 mg | −4.4% | 99.18% |
| Oct 7, 2025 | MOTS-CBatch Sept 15 2025 clear caps | Janoshik | 40 mg | 43.76 mg | +9.4% | 99.79% |
| Oct 7, 2025 | PT-141Batch Sept 19 2025 blue caps | Janoshik | 10 mg | 11.79 mg | +17.9% | 99.92% |
QLP: common questions
Is QLP legit?
We can't vouch for any vendor as a business, and we don't sell or recommend products. What we can show is what buyers' independent lab tests found: 0 of 5 QLP vials on file failed, meaning they were empty, under 95% pure, more than 20% under the label or more than 50% over it. That places QLP #16 of 30 ranked vendors, at market on our score. Results on file run from Oct 2025 to Oct 2025.
Has QLP been third-party tested?
Yes. We hold results for 5 QLP vials from 5 lab reports, tested by Janoshik. Each result comes from a lab report a buyer paid for, not from a certificate the vendor supplied.
Are QLP vials dosed correctly?
Across 5 vials where the lab measured the amount, the median QLP vial held +9.4% compared with its label. 0 of 5 held more than 10% less than the label said.
How pure is QLP?
The median QLP vial tested at 99.18% purity across 5 vials with a purity result. We count anything under 95% as a failed vial, and a vial at 99.5% or higher gets full marks for purity.
Does QLP pay to be listed or ranked?
No. VendorVerify sells nothing and takes no money from vendors. No affiliate links, no coupon codes, no paid rankings. A vendor's place comes only from lab results.
Will my QLP vial match these results?
Not necessarily. A lab report describes the vials that were tested, and batches differ. A clean record lowers the odds of a bad vial but doesn't rule one out, which is why newer reports count for more in the score.
Vendor Reviews
Bought from this vendor?
Sign in to write a review. Every review comes from a verified phone number and a real purchase.