Skip to content

BPC-157 lab test results by vendor

How each vendor's BPC-157 held up in independent third-party lab tests: purity, dose against the label, and how often vials failed.

What Is BPC-157? Benefits, Evidence & RisksWhat it does, what the research shows, and the known risks.

For research use only. VendorVerify sells nothing and takes no money from vendors. No affiliate links, no coupon codes, no paid rankings. How scores work

Vials tested
49
Lab reports
37
Vendors
15
Vials failed
6.1%
Median purity
99.55%
Median dose vs label
+17.4%

Results from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026. A vial fails if it's empty, under 95% pure, more than 20% under its label, or more than 50% over (3 of 49 vials).

Key facts

  • VendorVerify holds lab results for 49 BPC-157 vials from 15 vendors, from 37 independent lab reports dated Aug 2024 to Aug 2026.
  • 6.1% of BPC-157 vials on file failed (3 of 49), meaning empty, under 95% pure, more than 20% under label or more than 50% over.
  • The median BPC-157 vial on file tested at 99.55% purity.
  • The median BPC-157 vial on file held +17.4% compared with the amount on its label.
  • 1 vendor has 5 or more BPC-157 lab reports and is ranked for BPC-157.

BPC-157 vendors

VendorVerdictScoreFailed vialsLab reportsMedian dose vs labelAvg. purityVendor page
SRYBelow marketFailed vials77.516.7%6+39.0%99.74%View vendor SRY
Not enough data to rank (fewer than 5 lab reports)
TCINot ranked88.50.0%4+3.5%99.47%View vendor TCI
UtherNot ranked88.00.0%4+11.3%99.72%View vendor Uther
ASCNot ranked87.70.0%2+6.3%99.68%View vendor ASC
QSTNot ranked87.40.0%1+5.7%99.54%View vendor QST
SSANot ranked87.00.0%4+12.1%99.59%View vendor SSA
GYCNot ranked86.80.0%1—99.27%View vendor GYC
SNPNot ranked86.60.0%2+16.8%99.41%View vendor SNP
MPSNot ranked86.60.0%1+15.9%99.99%View vendor MPS
SPBNot ranked86.20.0%2+9.1%99.56%View vendor SPB
QSCNot ranked86.00.0%1+13.2%96.70%View vendor QSC
PTBNot ranked85.60.0%1+32.8%99.70%View vendor PTB
PGBNot ranked85.00.0%1+46.8%99.10%View vendor PGB
FSDNot ranked83.10.0%4+29.3%98.95%View vendor FSD
APSNot rankedFailed vials75.934.5%3+24.8%71.90%View vendor APS

Every BPC-157 vial against its label

One dot per vial, placed by how much it held compared with the amount on the label.

Dot chart of 41 vials (every BPC-157 vial on file), each placed by its measured amount compared with the label, from 50% under to 50% over. 3 are within 5% of the label, 37 are 5 to 20% under or more than 5% over, 1 are more than 20% under or more than 50% over, and 0 were empty.

BPC-157: common questions

Which BPC-157 vendors pass lab testing?

Among vendors with at least 5 lab reports for BPC-157, the highest scores currently go to SRY (score 77.5, 16.7% of vials failed). 1 vendor is ranked for BPC-157 in all, and the table on this page lists every vendor's results. Rankings change as new reports arrive.

How often do BPC-157 vials fail testing?

3 of 49 BPC-157 vials on file failed (6.1%). A vial fails if it's empty, under 95% pure, more than 20% under its label, or more than 50% over it.

Are BPC-157 vials underdosed?

Usually not; if anything they run over. The typical BPC-157 vial on file held +17.4% compared with the amount on its label. Individual vials vary much more than that, and the chart on this page shows every one.

What purity do BPC-157 vials test at?

The median BPC-157 vial tested at 99.55% purity. We count anything under 95% as a failed vial and give full marks for purity at 99.5% or higher, because small differences above that are within normal lab-to-lab variation.

Where do these BPC-157 results come from?

From 37 independent lab reports, mostly commissioned by buyers, covering 49 vials from 15 vendors, dated Aug 2024 to Aug 2026. VendorVerify doesn't test anything itself. A report a vendor paid for is only used if the lab can verify it, and it is marked as vendor-commissioned and counts at half weight.

Does VendorVerify sell BPC-157?

No. VendorVerify doesn't sell peptides of any kind. VendorVerify sells nothing and takes no money from vendors. No affiliate links, no coupon codes, no paid rankings.