Aurora SAB
also known as Aurora
Vials tend to hold more than the label (median +8.5%); 0 of 6 vials were more than 10% under.
For research use only. Vendors can't pay to change their score, rank or warnings. No affiliate links, no coupon codes, no paid rankings. How scores work
Every vial we have on file
- Within ±5% / purity 99%+
- 5–20% under, overfilled / purity 95–99%
- Failed: over 20% under, over 50% over, empty or under 95% pure
Dose vs label
6 vials measured · 0 emptyPurity
6 vials measured- Median purity
- 99.74%
- across 6 vials
- Median dose vs label
- +8.5%
- across 6 vials; + means more than the label
- Failed vials
- 0.0%
- 0 of 6 vials; the rate weights each lab report equally and recent reports more, as the score does
- Lab reports
- 3
- Apr 10, 2026 to Apr 24, 2026
Labs: Janoshik
Key facts
- VendorVerify holds third-party lab results for 6 Aurora SAB vials from 3 lab reports, dated Apr 2026 to Apr 2026.
- 0 of 6 Aurora SAB vials failed: empty, under 95% pure, more than 20% under the label or more than 50% over it.
- The median Aurora SAB vial tested at 99.74% purity across 6 vials with a purity result.
- The median Aurora SAB vial held +8.5% compared with its label across 6 vials where the lab measured the amount.
- Buyers have had 3 different compounds from Aurora SAB lab tested.
- Aurora SAB is not ranked because it has fewer than the 5 lab reports a vendor needs to be ranked.
- Aurora SAB vials on file were tested by Janoshik.
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your experience with Aurora SAB.
Contact & prices
Vendors can't pay to change their score, rank or warnings. Contact details are checked to belong to the vendor; that's not an endorsement.
For research use only. Not for human consumption. These vendors sell research chemicals, not medicines.
Sign in to see Aurora SAB's contact details and price list
Free account. We keep vendor contact details out of public pages.
Run Aurora SAB? Claim this listing to keep your contact details and prices up to date. It's free.
Vendor history
Our team reviews every entry before it's posted. Report a correction.
By peptide
| Peptide | Vials | Failed | Median purity | Median dose vs label | Dose vs label, −20% to +20% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOTS-C | 2 | 0 | 99.16% | +6.4% | |
| Retatrutide | 2 | 0 | 99.74% | +9.8% | |
| Tirzepatide | 2 | 0 | 99.87% | +11.5% |
Lab reports One row per tested vial, newest first.
| Date | Peptide | Lab | Label | Measured | Dose vs label | Purity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | MOTS-CBatch MOT10M102P (client 'LS Testing' on the report; posted on glp1forum.com/posts/197484/) | Janoshik | 10 mg | 10.55 mg | +5.5% | 99.16% |
| Apr 24, 2026 | MOTS-CBatch MOT10M102P (client 'LS Testing' on the report; posted on glp1forum.com/posts/197484/) | Janoshik | 10 mg | 10.72 mg | +7.2% | 99.16% |
| Apr 15, 2026 | RetatrutideBatch RT10N105P (client 'LS Testing' on the report; posted on glp1forum.com/posts/197482/) | Janoshik | 10 mg | 11.04 mg | +10.4% | 99.75% |
| Apr 15, 2026 | RetatrutideBatch RT10N105P (client 'LS Testing' on the report; posted on glp1forum.com/posts/197482/) | Janoshik | 10 mg | 10.93 mg | +9.3% | 99.73% |
| Apr 10, 2026 | TirzepatideBatch ****N105P (client 'LS Testing (Becs)' on the report; posted on glp1forum.com/posts/197483/) | Janoshik | 30 mg | 34.58 mg | +15.3% | 99.86% |
| Apr 10, 2026 | TirzepatideBatch ****N105P (client 'LS Testing (Becs)' on the report; posted on glp1forum.com/posts/197483/) | Janoshik | 30 mg | 32.31 mg | +7.7% | 99.88% |
Other lab tests
Endotoxin, TFA, counterion and contaminant checks, as reported by the lab. They are shown for transparency and are not part of the score.
| Date | Peptide | Test | Result | Lab |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026 | TirzepatideBatch ****N105P (client 'LS Testing (Becs)' on the report; posted on glp1forum.com/posts/197483/) | Endotoxin | >100 EU/Vial (119.900 EU/Vial estimate) | Janoshik |
| Apr 24, 2026 | MOTS-CBatch MOT10M102P (client 'LS Testing' on the report; posted on glp1forum.com/posts/197484/) | Endotoxin | 1.655 EU/Vial | Janoshik |
| Apr 1, 2026 | RetatrutideBatch RT10N105P (client 'LS Testing' on the report; posted on glp1forum.com/posts/197482/) | Endotoxin | >10 EU/Vial (10.860 EU/Vial estimate) | Janoshik |
Aurora SAB: common questions
Is Aurora SAB legit?
We can't vouch for any vendor as a business, and we don't sell peptides or recommend products. What we can show is what buyers' independent lab tests found: 0 of 6 Aurora SAB vials on file failed, meaning they were empty, under 95% pure, more than 20% under the label or more than 50% over it. Aurora SAB has 3 lab reports on file, fewer than the 5 needed to be ranked, so treat this as early data. Results on file run from Apr 2026 to Apr 2026.
Has Aurora SAB been third-party tested?
Yes. We hold results for 6 Aurora SAB vials from 3 lab reports, tested by Janoshik. Each result comes from a lab report a buyer paid for, not from a certificate the vendor supplied.
Are Aurora SAB vials dosed correctly?
Across 6 vials where the lab measured the amount, the median Aurora SAB vial held +8.5% compared with its label. 0 of 6 held more than 10% less than the label said.
How pure is Aurora SAB?
The median Aurora SAB vial tested at 99.74% purity across 6 vials with a purity result. We count anything under 95% as a failed vial, and a vial at 99.5% or higher gets full marks for purity.
Does Aurora SAB pay to be listed or ranked?
No. Vendors can't pay to change their score, rank or warnings. No affiliate links, no coupon codes, no paid rankings. A vendor's place comes only from lab results.
Will my Aurora SAB vial match these results?
Not necessarily. A lab report describes the vials that were tested, and batches differ. A clean record lowers the odds of a bad vial but doesn't rule one out, which is why newer reports count for more in the score.
Vendor Reviews
Bought from this vendor?
Sign in to write a review. Every review comes from a verified phone number and a real purchase.
Have a lab report for a vial you bought?
Help the community by sharing your independent lab results.